rss

Featured Articles

  • 0
    4th Annual Jell-O Snarf Crowns New Champion [Video]

    4th Annual Jell-O Snarf Crowns New Champion [Video]

    Today was the 4th annual SEO.com Jell-O Snarfing contest Last years champion, Greg Bay, ,decided to go on vacation rather than stay and defend the title he has held for the last 2 years. (Shame on him) But this year was a very exciting event, as well as disgusting. While some came to compete, others had no idea what they were getting

  • 0
    Facebook IPO vs Ford (real world) Valuation Comparison

    Facebook IPO vs Ford (real world) Valuation Comparison

    About 10 minutes ago (as I start writing this blog post at least) investors were able to buy into Facebook.

  • 0
    With Today’s IPO, Will May 18, 2012 Now Be Known As Facebook Day?

    With Today’s IPO, Will May 18, 2012 Now Be Known As Facebook Day?

    Facebook… love the social network or hate it, finally went public today.

  • 0
    Salespeople are evil, even at Google

    Salespeople are evil, even at Google

    If you use a Google product or service to call someone instead of sending them some GMail, that conversation isn’t relevant to Google, at least not yet. I can just picture the sales team at Google are sitting around thinking about how knowing their users, via analysis of email/search/etc.., drives their product, and how people using their services via video/audio are escaping that analysis.

  • 0
    Why Canada Will be “sorry” for The Canadian Copyright Modernization Act (Bill C-11)

    Why Canada Will be “sorry” for The Canadian Copyright Modernization Act (Bill C-11)

    The Canadian government has imposed a limit on Parliamentary debate for Bill C-11: The Copyright Modernization Act which will completely change the way that Canadians interact with web content. While the bill’s proponents state that there are many benefits to the act, opponents state that the bill’s “digital lock” provisions are excessively restrictive and feel that they are the result of increasing pressure from US corporations

  • 0
    Finnish them! (Google Glasses and WiFi Liabillity)

    Finnish them! (Google Glasses and WiFi Liabillity)

    In a piracy case that’s been sitting around since 2010, a Finnish Court (*Ylivieskan käräjäoikeus) has officially sided with the defendant, stating that she is not liable for her open WiFi connection. The details of this particular case were very unique in that the timing of the infringement, a 12-minute period of piracy, occurred shortly after the woman in question hosted a public play with an audience of over 100 people in her home, which used to be a school until she purchased it. Since there’s clearly no way to prove the home owner committed the act of piracy the court moved on to deliberate if the woman could be liable for ‘copyright infringement’ simply for not applying password protection to her WiFi connection.

banner ad